Kekek ye hai bhosadpillo ka leader
6a517E
No.462168
>>462142(OP)
His father was one of the richest man in British India, his grandfather was high official in Mughal court.
He was handed over Power. Literal Transfer.
Ultra privileged.
His "jail" was literally Aga Khan PALACE.
QbT55C
No.462853
>>462168
its quite hilarious how (indian) kangers/kangressis/unionists often come here to pollute this place with same doomposting and randirona. they think negru cared about his (indian)folk kek. negru had literally no vision for a modern india, same for CONgress, no wonder even after 60 years half of country was shitting in open.
WP3UsW
No.462864
>>462853
Kek this reminds of that great greentext where pic not rel of neeru described chodiji, it made lots of bhakts seethe
Does anyone have it? Pls post if do
pJFpIF
No.462872
>>462142(OP)
>"Hmm Panditji letting the ladies have the seat like the gentleman, what a looser"
Another raitoid seethe
pJFpIF
No.462878
>>462168
Logo ne apne nakhun tak ukhadwa lie for pajeet 70 yes later to say power transfer saaar
uqwRdA
No.462901
>>462142(OP)
What's wrong with it
gB37iI
No.462933
>>462142(OP)
Yaar pajeet he is the reason why this country is in gutters. Itna ganda strawman sirf ek pajeet hi apni gand se nikal sakta hai
/8vCgX
No.463193
>>462878
Bsdk it clearly was power transfer.
Britishers literally made Gateway of India to mark their departure. Which is biggest tourist attraction in most important Indian city, Slumbai.
Their left on their own, WW2 and it's consequences.
Gandhi, Nehru were pacifist leaders, there to control masses.
Wtgynh
No.463198
>>463193
>Britishers literally made Gateway of India to mark their departure
Gateway of India made in 1924 Ye to iq hai in chaman chutiyo ki
(Text Content Sanitized Too.)
jNKeUD
No.463199
>>463193
Gateway of India made in 1924. Ye to iq hai in chaman chutiyo ki
/8vCgX
No.463202
>>463199
The Gateway is also the monument from where the last British troops left in 1948, following Indian independence a year earlier.
Saar ! Aazadi saar, bc freedom mil gayi British troops apni marzi se kaise gye?
Ganduji ne laathi se bhagaya saar. Jab train me travel kre to thank British Empire.
jNKeUD
No.463203
>>463202
Arre t3ri ma ki chut history class bunk nahi Kari hoti to aaj yaha gand na khol raha hota , paj3t tu bana hi gulami ke liye hai pehle mullo ki ab goro ki
jNKeUD
No.463206
>>463202
T3re modi baap ne kya krdia ne chintu le dekh tera contribution sala napunsak kahi ka
/8vCgX
No.463629
>>463203
Chal be chakke, I respect what British Empire did for world, unlike u I love in reality.
They later become cuck tho
Picrel is ur supparpowar, vishwagoo colony.
/8vCgX
No.463635
>>463206
Abe laadle, u will never be able to hate Chodi baniya more than I do kek
If I don't like Negru baman, doesn't mean I support gujju dhandhos.
I'm the one spamming anti-modi videos deapte getting banned multiple times.
Respect me and Cope.
HT1ZJN
No.463639
>>462142(OP)
He maybe perv but he had vision unlike bhimendra gobhi
1kibh8
No.463718
>>463629
Abe gandu British are the reason this is staple. Tujh jese keede bane hi hai ronde jane ke liye only reason ur using a phone is cause ur baap gave his zuban se pocha to sm babu's shoes
1kibh8
No.463721
>>463635
You hate nehru and modi cause ur a angrezo ka abandoned kutta. I hate them cause they are incompetent.
Abe ghochu wo vedio maine hi banai hai award du kya tujhe vedio post krne ka? Bhej de apni amma ko saja ke deta hu award. 
/8vCgX
No.463751
>>463718
British are the reason u have modern world, chaman chutiye.
Stop using the Internet and go live like u abbo ancestors.
/8vCgX
No.463754
>>463721
Abe lodu Chamar, i hate them bcs they are incompetent too.
I respect Lee Kuan Yew more than any other leader in last 80 years.
I'm just appreciating what British did for the world and India.
U made that video bcs u are a Congressi kutta, I'm using that video bcs i see no diff. between him Lehru.
Cope more !
82zGkv
No.463782
>>463751
Abe ghonchu le le tera modern world right next to British capital since British days. Mera angrez mahaan saar gora sahab come back lord clive fuck me
82zGkv
No.463786
>>463754
Batti bana le us chinki ki aur apne gand me dal le
>British did good for India
>Ok, what abt the bad?
>British did good for India , let us stay slave
Randi ka pilla sala
82zGkv
No.463789
>>463760
Ye Chutiya gaya hai jab se iski maa ne iske gore sautele bhai ko janam dia
YIu1OH
No.463791
>>463782
kek, dont argue this is the same 29 year old neetfag.
82zGkv
No.463798
>>463791
Topkek. 29 yr old NEET projecting his own small lulli inferiority
YIu1OH
No.463799
>>463786
brit infra in india was to support their own goals only and most it was upgraded and electrified. we should thank upa dalits for adding negligible length in 60 years of rule.
/8vCgX
No.463814
>>463782
That's chamar colony. Gora left 80 years ago. Whatever u do now it's ur own incompetence.
>>463799
And internet was for military purpose, railways run India. Stop hating British Empire blindly.
Congress did the psychosis to legitimise their claim.
>>463791
>>463798
Chakko tum raho gutter mein, mujhe kya. Can't change the reality.
>>463786
British Empire was a net positive for India unlike Mughals and others. That's all I'm saying.
Do u know first Engineering college was made by them, which Lehru renamed as IIT.
Give credit where is due
YIu1OH
No.463827
>>463814
you are neet, mald more
QV4E/J
No.463851
>>463799
I appreciate angrez for sm things but not like this ghochu anon
QV4E/J
No.463855
>>463814
>That's chamar colony. Gora left 80 years ago. Whatever u do now it's ur own incompetence.
So why didn't u najayaz baaap do smthing?
>Stop hating British Empire blindly.
More railways have been built in last 20 yrs than British did in 100
>Chakko tum raho gutter mein, mujhe kya. Can't change the reality.
Yes cause ur getting angrezi residence on this kek
>British Empire was a net positive for India unlike Mughals and others. That's all I'm saying.
Us basis se to sab kuch hi net positive le sakte hai hum. You are dickriding them not bringing their positives.
>>463814
Kharagpur?
In 1946, a committee was set up by Sir Jogendra Singh, Member of the Viceroy's executive council, to consider the creation of higher technical institutions for the industrial development of India post World War II. This was followed by the creation of a 22-member committee headed by
/8vCgX
No.463865
>>463855
They left 80 years ago, compare to other countries in post colonial era, India did nothing great.
Railway expansion is not something remarkable, if India had developed some indigenous technology like Japan build Bullet train even after nuclear btfo. That would be worthy of talk.
Nhi, most empires were net negative, Shah Jahan drained all treasury in his vanity projects.
Britain bring Industrial revolution and modern education to India.
Mughals apart from art and food did not do much technological development.
Again, read history in unbiased manner.
Britishers also the first to abolish Slavery in India
Indian Slavery Act, 1843.
There were some bad things they did like all other empires, but u are still using their governing system, their language etc.
And majority of people have nothing to began with, so I have nothing to cry about fall of previous kingdoms.
" Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IIT Roorkee) (formerly Thomason College of Civil Engineering), established in 1847 in Uttarakhand, is recognized as India's first engineering college. Founded to train officers for the Ganges Canal project, it was renamed in 1854 and later converted into an IIT in 2001. It is also considered Asia's first technical institution. "
1jUHIi
No.463905
>>463865
>They left 80 years ago, compare to other countries in post colonial era, India did nothing great.
This is pretty much false when you consider the size and diversity of India.
>Railway expansion is not something remarkable, if India had developed some indigenous technology like Japan build Bullet train even after nuclear btfo. That would be worthy of talk.
That's pretty lame talk since all technology is interconnected. You are comparing with japan which was never colonised.
>Nhi, most empires were net negative, Shah Jahan drained all treasury in his vanity projects.
Absolute false shahjahan won the war till Uzbekistan and Indians loved relatively better under Mughal sultanate than Europe of the era minus the religious persecution. Mughal aristocracy was Indian.
>Britain bring Industrial revolution and modern education to India.
So much industrial revolution tht most of India had just jute and cotton industries? Only two iron and steel were started by Paris. Education? Fair British did do us benefit but that's forgetting the British trained ppl to be clerks and officers the result you can see in today's babudom.
>Mughals apart from art and food did not do much technological development.
Mughals brought improvements in metallurgy , ship building, arms manufacture , what are you on about?
>Britishers also the first to abolish Slavery in India
Arthasastra lays out clearly Aryas including shudras are not to be enslaved.
>Indian Slavery Act, 1843.
You forgot that company officers continued to purchase slaves and so did natives without any changes till 1900s.
>but u are still using their governing system, their language etc.
मुझे कोई आपत्ति नहीं हिंदी में विवाद करने में, क्या आप कर सकते है? साथ ही रही राजसत्ता की बात तो अंग्रेजी राज सत्ता में कोई परिवर्तन लाने की आवश्यकता ही नहीं थी, इसका ये मतलब नहीं कि ये अच्छी है। लोग इससे जुड़े थे इसीलिए हम इसे आज भी प्रयोग कर रहे।
>And majority of people have nothing to began with, so I have nothing to cry about fall of previous kingdoms.
Again false.
>Engineering college
>this included an engineering class for the domiciled British and some Indians; an upper subordinates class for British noncommissioned officers; and a lower subordinates class for Indian surveyors. By the mid-1880s, "the school has a hundred students, substantial buildings, and a reputation as an important center for the study of hydraulic engineering
Wah sir what a masterstroke, maan gaye.
YcuSit
No.463978
>>463905
>Arthasastra lays out clearly Aryas including shudras are not to be enslaved.
Shudras are supposed to be symbiotic slave. Any pajeet saying otherewise is a lying faggot
Hpk2kw
No.464367
>>463905
Kya Champu aadmi hai tu.
Okay, bro people were well in Mughal era than British one.
Keep coping, I'm not gonna reply to q guy who couldn't see clear cut reality of modern world and wests contribution to it.
All you have are Congressi talking point against British Empire.
And people were trained as clerks at start, then they rose to civil services too. All leaders of Congress and others were British educated.
How did that happen?
And no, there is no evidence that Mauryan Empire abolished slavery.
British Empire spent its own money and manpower to end slave trade not only in Atlantic but Arab trade as well, which lasted for 2000 years.
They paid huge price for it. They went extreme on liberalism, and that's very evident now.
Yes, making first Enginnering college of Asia is not a big deal, right.
Not even building biggest and most prosperous city of Asia(Calcutta).
Then commie bastards ruined it.
Go to Delhi, and see the govt. offices. How most of workings are same, they still live and work in same British made buildings, with same govt. structure, same electoral system etc.
This will be my last message.
>>463978
People like him really believe this shit lmao
They are one, who foam at mouth and claim, saar we already have that in our texts saaar, puspak viman saar, Ganesh had plastic surgery saar, nuclear weapon in mahabharat saar. everytime some innovation happens in west.
B35xPG
No.464587
>>464367
KILL ALL GUJJARS, BEHEAD ALL GUJJARS, TOTAL GUJJAR DEATH, SUBHUMAN NEET.
