You dont respect wimminz? Wtf is dis?
aVYLJH
No.464471
>>464464(OP)
How long do Jat think they will be able to resist AASI-milation, now even their (indian) women are becoming hardcore librandans?
cmKCTb
No.464483
>>464471
All jeetas are librandan, by "all" I mean regardless of their jati. Women are more included to left, so naturally they don't care about càste. If we don't care about (indian), then why do we care about us marrying Indians at all? Why can't we just marry white womens and make gori men true? When you think about it, jeetas can be credited for all the things that went wrong in past with how far the bhim meme floated.
WXVv/X
No.464491
>>464483
Why so much hate for women? Whenever any cross cultural marriage happens, theres also a guy who is marrying out so why single out women?
LPN4Pp
No.464492
>>464483
>Why can't we just marry white womens and make gori men true?
Tuujhe rok kon rha hai goberjeet
Kabr7a
No.464494
>>464491
Because women are property
aVYLJH
No.464498
>>464483
Still you would not want to fill a country with abbo chimps a change demographics to the one which is hostile toward you and your culture, but they will realise it too late
WXVv/X
No.464508
>>464494
Whats with blaming for all librandu faggotry when men are equal participants. It takes two hands to clap. Most women arent having sex with each other.
cmKCTb
No.464567
>>464491
>Why so much hate for women?
They are only ones who thinks it's a baggage to marry within their (indian).
>Whenever any cross cultural marriage happens, theres also a guy who is marrying out so why single out women?
Guys are shitted on as well. Guys whine less about it, when they are encountered or when they are shat on for such behaviour. Women don't, so they proceed to appropriate it.
An anon in past explained this very well, that the men are handoos because they find it disgusting to live alongside parasites their ancestors would have slaughtered while women are handoos as islam would have btfo'd their whorish tendency.
Life would be easy if men just conveniently went on to accept marrying outside their Varna, or even marrying outside their race, or actually if we all just stop caring about celibacy. Religious or any other moral nignoggery stops using since a lot of men feels like their is inherently something a little wrong with it.
Women have no morality, women are whores and majority of them have had a boyfriend, or even went as far as sleeping with a muslim. If not they were sending nudes to muslim. Honda sherni are a living baggage to Hindus. They are a baggage to both UC's, the UR and OBC one. What more of a reason do we need? Or anyone needs?
fq0lvd
No.464573
>>464483
>Women are more included to left
Thats not true for lundia. More women in lundia vote right wing. Even among the women that vote left, most of them just vote left because they are promised gibs as they are mostly lower case or muslim women, and not voting for any ideological reasons.
In every soyciety, its moids who fall for left, first it starts with high status moids - urban, educated, the high income kind, then afterwards, women start falling for it as they gravitate towards where power shifts.
cmKCTb
No.464575
>>464492
>Tuujhe rok kon rha hai goberjeet
Apni maa se puch.
>>464498
>Still you would not want to fill a country with abbo chimps
Why not? Bhai khud soch na, agar UC ladkiya, both UR and OBC randiya pan kar rahi hai, toh behenchod lad kis chiz ke liye rahe hai hum? We all can pretend we are willing to chop of some mudslime's head, lekin galti honi bhi toh chahiye na?
Ghanta pata hai hume, apne marzi se gayi thi ki nahi? Truth is, burying women who were whores was based. Men are willing to die hoping to go as far as protect their women, but women think of immolation as "objectification" rather would prefer being cum dump. When you bring this up they try to spin it as some form of this cute little cuck fantasy as if it's not literally how it has been going for past decade.
>a change demographics to the one which is hostile toward you and your culture, but they will realise it too late
Abe ghanta bacha rahe hai hum sab culture? Yaar take a look, both OBC and UR women are retarded. Going to bars, openly daring bunch of inbreds, and then chimping out when they all end up dead. Unironically isse better hota if we all just converted to Islam.
Women are rotting this faith from inside, and all the things it stood for. We are only delaying the inevitable. Mujhe bhi kya fark padta hai, kaun si càste ki randi kis chamar se chud rahi hai. If I don't marry and don't have kids, and stop trying to bother myself, what difference does it make to me? Lelo tum sab bhi black pill. Draw the line yaar, abhi nahi line draw Kiya tha, toh fir kabhi nahi kar payoge tum sab.
WXVv/X
No.464577
>>464567
>Women have no morality, women are whores and majority of them have had a boyfriend, or even went as far as sleeping with a muslim.
Lmao. Well if they have boyfriends, men are equally culpable as they are the ones becoming the boyfriends. If you mean there is a small set of chads who pump and dump all women maybe your rage should be directed more towards those men.
cmKCTb
No.464586
>>464573
>Thats not true for lundia.
Accha retard?
>More women in lundia vote right wing.
We don't have a right wing party dumbass, we never had a right wing party in the first place. All form of right wing ideologies such as Varna purity as well as anti abrahamic elements are very strongly repulsed by feminist movements.
If they don't oppose all of it, they oppose some of it thinking it is some form of bargain chip, that is not how this shit works.
>Even among the women that vote left, most of them just vote left because they are promised gibs as they are mostly lower case or muslim women, and not voting for any ideological reasons.
Anon, majority of women are left aligning by default. Vocally as well. Women don't have any real political ideology, they are midwits. Agar sanak movie dekhi hai, they will feel like they want to date a low (indian) boy and be some kind of acceptable mud shark savarna Feminist.
If they have watched padmavat they will feel like being a Honda sherni, despite a mud slime ex, thinking they are suddenly same as women who immolated themself before letting invaders ever touch them.
>In every soyciety, its moids who fall for left,
<Men started first genocide against abrahamic
<Most Men formed first ever republican party
<Men formed the first ever anti LGBT notions
<Most men align with anti islamic notions
<Men decide to commit to Gujarat Riots
<Saar mOiDs aRe lEfR
Literal whore logic. Even foids are actually bit less retarded than this.
>first it starts with high status moids - urban, educated, the high income kind, then afterwards, women start falling for it as they gravitate towards where power shifts.
That's also a retarded take. Awkward goat or any such woman is not doing it to please any men. In any manner, no man is benefiting from the stable antagonism of men and specifically savarna men on online spaces or forming laws against them.
Feminism and free gibs and love for islam had and always will go hand in hand. Only reason foids don't seem to question it is because most of them are unironically midwit retards.
Ij6l4w
No.464590
>>464577
>sar hate the person who have nothing to do with you don't hate the actual whores
Achha laudi
cmKCTb
No.464591
>>464576
>My point is that women is by and large just a reflection of the society they are in.
My point exactly. Women are midwits, thus they are unironically leftist. Women by default are a group strongly aligned with both normalisation of sex work such as use of only fans, as they all refuse to believe anything is wrong with it.
Women are far more inclusive of groups like the LGBTroons because women are again, midwits, and less likely to question it. Men are either very low wits and follow gutteral instinct or clearly see past logic behind why a social stigma even exists, towards jai bhim, mudslimes and so on.
Women are also conflate the idea of Varna and other such beliefs aligns with control of the girl or virginity. Since a woman only has to exist to get sex, this also makes her significantly an easy prey to this ideology, but being unable to say no, simply means she chooses to be a whore.
>Overwhelming number of women in the west supports progressive causes because Wokism/Progressivism is basically the religion of the West.
It's the religion everywhere for women. We all can pretend it's not a gender thing, but it is and it always has been. Liberalism will favour women more because it goes out of its way, while the majority of conservative belief favours men a bit more because it's the stronger gender that is the one to get shit done. That's just how nature is.
cmKCTb
No.464593
>>464577
>Lmao. Well if they have boyfriends, men are equally culpable as they are the ones becoming the boyfriends.
Doesn't matter, a whore is still a whore. You are free to ask women to not marry the whoremaker either, but reality is women actually find the guy who is attractive to other women simply a little more desirable.
>If you mean there is a small set of chads who pump and dump all women maybe your rage should be directed more towards those men.
I have no rage towards whores. I am pretty sure I made it clear, but whores exist in all society. The issue comes from treating whores like women or vice versa. Women who maintain chastity are a class of women fit for marriage. Women who do not, are not. It's quite simple.
WXVv/X
No.464597
>>464590
Abe i am not a foid. I just find it stupid we direct all blame at women and ignore the men who enable randidom i.e bad boys. You wont have randis if we did something about bad boys.
fq0lvd
No.464600
>>464586
>Accha retard?
You can check the stats yourself bud
>We don't have a right wing party dumbass, we never had a right wing party in the first place
Nothing more than ideological puritanism sirs. If you talk to a leftoid, he too will assert there is no 'troo left wing' party in the West.
Its just no true scotsman fallacy. These things fall on a spectrum and there is a clear left wing and right wing party in every country.
>strongly repulsed by feminist movements
And? Your point? I never said feminists support them all lol. My point is overwhelming number of women in India don't support leftism and many either don't know what feminism even is or if they do, its mostly just a curated form which is basically 'urrm men equal to wimin sirs' which are easily deboonked in a vaccum.
>that is not how this shit works
Vast number of people are not very ideological and don't vote based on ideology shit my guy. They vote mostly based on vibes. A devout muslim man would actually vote for right wing parties because they are the ones most ideologically closely aligned with them but thats not what happens and they vote for left wing parties and then wonder why their thotters after a generation are turning to rands kek.
>Literal whore logic. Even foids are actually bit less retarded than this.
And all of them are true kek. Your point. Maybe stop being so angry so much.
You think a woman actually argues like this? Most of the feminist retards don't even know that most women opposed the 19th amendment in USA and it was the men who supported it and their so called 'rights' were literally fought and given to them by men.
>Awkward goat
They are anamolies. For every Awkward Goat, there's like 100s of Rathee and Soch and Kumra and such. Most women aren't that agentic.
cmKCTb
No.464602
>>464590
I don't understand the randi logic women come up with. We know that subhuman jai bhims and mud slimes literally get off the idea of taking any sexual advantage of OBC and UR women, if it is a common fact that these parasites only view all these girls as sexual accomplishment then why and how are we supposed to reason with them?
It's even worse because when we try to threaten them, other girls tend to get in the way of both of us OBC and UR men. It makes it factually close to impossible to fight this off. The least we can do is expect women of our community to be held accountable to who they spread their legs too.
Foids are retarded, and men who enable these foids are equally retarded. Too many whores got told that they got ran through and their loose pussy got treated like some cum dump but it doesn't matter since some "understanding" jeet will come and beta buxx them, guess fucking what, not how this shit works.
You either align with every single conservative view or you don't. Truth is women simply don't. Overwhelming majority of them don't, specially the girls from tier 1. We can use logic that "but this is not true in India", it is. It's just not taking shape yet. Dimorphism is destiny, and the true wave of feminism just had not hit the nation, but when it does it will be fucking brutal, since we don't even have the demograph to fight it off.
Foids have single handedly spelt the doom of this nation, it's culture and it's faith. By the time we all address and realise this, it will be way too late.
cmKCTb
No.464603
>>464597
>Abe i am not a foid. I just find it stupid we direct all blame at women and ignore the men who enable randidom
<Let's blame the retarded drivers even if we all have established that they don't care about the rules in the first place
<i.e bad boys.
Yaar retard
<You wont have randis if we did something about bad boys.
Holy fucking retard. What the fuck do you think a "bad boy" is? Why the fuck do you expect us to be reasoning with chamar and mud slimes in the first place? What kind of literal dehati biharandi logic is this?
fq0lvd
No.464605
>>464591
>Liberalism will favour women more because it goes out of its way, while the majority of conservative belief favours men a bit more because it's the stronger gender that is the one to get shit done.
No, it favoured women because it was the motivated by the same ideological motivations of the white saviour complex, this time directed towards 'disenfranchised' groups instead of colonies and made racialy nuetral.
It fed in to the same kind of ego fulfillment which is why men created it and promoted it, even if it put them at a disadvantage.
ic6V5+
No.464621
fq0lvd
No.464632
>>464602
>Foids have single handedly spelt the doom of this nation, it's culture and it's faith. By the time we all address and realise this, it will be way too late.
Its actually jeet parents who did this.
They instead of marrying their thotters off early invest in their 'ejucashun' and prolong their marriage in hopes of getting better 'matches' or getting more money from her salary.
I mean, no hate to wahmen who are actually smart and all, but vast majority of women are better off being employed in some blue collar work and married off early. And I show no such bias to my own family, just other day I told my parents that even their dotter is better off being married off early and they should stop deluding she will become some Kiran Bedi with her actual academic talent lol.
cmKCTb
No.464637
>>464600
>You can check the stats yourself bud
Take a check on which political ideology has been favoured by both genders globally buddy.
>>464600
>Nothing more than ideological puritanism sirs. If you talk to a leftoid, he too will assert there is no 'troo left wing' party in the West.
That's objectively false. We actually don't have a right wing party at all, since while USA will and happily make a statement about how faggots don't deserve marriage and how Christ is the true faith, we can't do same in this nation at all.
We unironically don't have a right wing party. It is ok for republican to focus on working class, as white men marrying white women to have white kids. If UC's, be it OBC or UC made the similar statement, they would be crucified due to the way constitution is cucked.
>Its just no true scotsman fallacy. These things fall on a spectrum and there is a clear left wing and right wing party in every country.
Objectively false again. Scotsman fallacy is not applicable here because there actually is a very clear idea of right wing here. Fundamentally BJP has done nothing at all that would categorise it as a right wing party, except for Gujarat Riot's and that too is not basis of the party itself, or promises it makes. That's a false Equivalence if we try to make it "right vs left" party in the first place.
>>464600
>And? Your point? I never said feminists support them all lol. My point is overwhelming number of women in India don't support leftism
Doesn't matter as leftist is actually still political side women align by. Idea of sleeping arround with no consequences is something that a lot of women find comfort in. This doesn't benefit a big number of men, as men don't get sex as easily in the first place.
Leftist parties also strongly support giving the women illusion of equality when a true right wing is conservative by nature. Most raitas will firmly agree women or ladli behen yojna is not matter of purity, it's just objectively retarded for any party to do it and try to be labelled "right".
All anon here realise women are both, lowe in the scale of physical strength as well as intellect. It is even true for women themself. By trying to reward majority like this, women drag down the society. Again, the political divide is not as clear as USA in India because we simply don't have a right wing party. Both parties have and continue to support food delusions that they are even a little bit helpful.
>and many either don't know what feminism even is or if they do, its mostly just a curated form which is basically 'urrm men equal to wimin sirs' which are easily deboonked in a vaccum.
Also true. But that doesn't disapprove my point. I am not saying feminism being right or wrong is a matter of relevance here. I am saying since left exists as a concept, it goes hand in hand with the concept of feminism. Feminism doesn't have a defined definition, it fluctuates based on the said convenience of foids in question. Foids will, this always align with feminism, and by extension left.
>Vast number of people are not very ideological and don't vote based on ideology shit my guy.
I disagree. Everyone has an ideology, it can not be as deep as mine or doesn't have to be as simple as yours. But any thought or idea that drives people to vote for any party at all, is driven by ideology.
>They vote mostly based on vibes. A devout muslim man would actually vote for right wing parties because they are the ones most ideologically closely aligned with them but thats not what happens and they vote for left wing parties and then wonder why their thotters after a generation are turning to rands kek.
I also agree with this, but that itself is ideology anon. If you vote for a party because felt the other party is threat
Yr/2/B
No.464638
>>464597
>saar hate the guy who fucks my waife not my waife who is a whore and lied to me
Kuch nhi ho sakta pajeet ka. Pajeet cuck hon ke liye hi paiyda hua hai
fq0lvd
No.464639
>>464637
>globally
We are talking about India here
There is no point in continuing this conversation if you are being this dishonest. All you will be doing is continue spamming a wall of seethe at me.
WXVv/X
No.464654
>>464638
I hate both. Sorry i am not gay for men like you are to excuse them. I hate those men. They are as much responsible.
cmKCTb
No.464656
>>464600
>And all of them are true kek.
Your delusions doesn't constitute a universal fact anon.
>You think a woman actually argues like this?
Unironically yes. Majority of foids actually do argue like this believing they are making a point without seeing basic logical fallacy.
>Most of the feminist retards don't even know that most women opposed the 19th amendment in USA and it was the men who supported it and their so called 'rights' were literally fought and given to them by men.
Also am aware, and everyone knows that again, foids are mid wits, and if at the time height of the intellect is average by current standards then the women would be retarded at the time. India is no different.
In reality we want a world that is safe for our own daughters and don't want them to be thotters. I am sure you don't want your daughter to end up with delusions of being a boy, and being some cum dump for mud slime LC either, yes? Left is by its nature a propaganda, and propaganda is targeted to midwits, and women are infact, the bulk of mid wits.
>>Awkward goat
>They are anamolies.
They are not. The vocal part is anomaly, the belief is not. Women are retarded and they all are incompetent, but that doesn't mean their lack of morality changes from it. Their is a reason why a large majority of women have a tendency to go dress up as feminism, only to end up being some mudslime's dishwasher.
>For every Awkward Goat, there's like 100s of Rathee and Soch and Kumra and such. Most women aren't that agentic.
Simply untrue. It's true that figures like Rather exist, but they do so to cared to women. Women are not children despite being mid wits, they are just not as smart as they think. They feel like they understand this shit and grifters like Rathee will feed them exactly what they want to hear.
This bringing us to original point.
All jeetas are librandan. Regardless of the fact if she is UC or not, she will end up being librand if she is left to her own devices since women don't have core morality, their morality is reflection of society.
Women will always align with left since they all feel no baggage aborting a child, knowing it is clearly murder, because left will make them all feel like it's not.
Women won't feel bad allowing rapists from borders of Bangladesh, since it's not them who die on those borders it's the men, and left will say things like they are good friends.
Women are emotionally driven, self destructive and physically weak sex, which has been pushed to hate the better sex for simply the fact of being better. Men have been taught to take guilt or feel bad about being the better sex and fight other men for as much as bringing it up. It's just how the world is.
fq0lvd
No.464661
>>464656
>Majority of foids actually do argue like this believing they are making a point without seeing basic logical fallacy.
Argue like what?
cmKCTb
No.464674
>>464605
>No, it favoured women because it was the motivated by the same ideological motivations of the white saviour complex, this time directed towards 'disenfranchised' groups instead of colonies and made racialy nuetral.
White saviour complex IS going out of your way to establish the weaker and less competent as equall, that is literally saying nothing. You are just forming empty string of words.
>It fed in to the same kind of ego fulfillment which is why men created it and promoted it, even if it put them at a disadvantage.
Yes that is what I said, but again, that doesn't have anything to do with point of this subject. The point is women will always go for the idea of liberalism because it aligns with them due to its sex postive nature, less punishing gender roles as they believe it to be.
It can also be due to lack of said accountability along side women being rewarded for being the weaker and less competent sex. It is not about "why it was made" it's about the "why foids will choose it". They have plenty of reasons to do so, due to superficial nature of left.
Since both of our big parties are left aligning, we don't have any other minor parties that is right wing either, we end up here. That makes it close to impossible if we want to have "right wing vs left wing", not just due to right vs left puritanism, but because we don't have "two parties". Even on a spectrum most of them daily right wing label.
cmKCTb
No.464681
>>464615
>I am just pointing out you fail to acknowledge that a section of men (including UC men) too are benefitting from randidom. You cant pin it all on women like you did here
If the ratio actually goes that 80% of women are sleeping with 20% of men (which is very clearly an exaggeration) then the blame will still fall on larger demographic. Women are actively told to not follow morality as it is oppressive which is far more prominent in tier 1 cities.
There are close to no virgin women above the age of 25 in this day and age. The form this very overwhelming minority. You can on the other hand find countless men who are celibate who wish to be celibate even.
There are naturally some UC men too, but again, we can't reason with people who are beyond the reason in first place. Jeetas with a tendency to be a whore, will be a whore since women are more likely to be approached for sex.
>>464621
>Nope
All modern jeetas are on librandan spectrum, this they all are libRAND with rand in capital, with no exception anon.
cmKCTb
No.464687
>>464632
>Its actually jeet parents who did this.
You can't blame a jeeta spreading her legs for men before marriage on her boomer parents. At best you can say her parents didn't beat her up as much as they should.
>They instead of marrying their thotters off early invest in their 'ejucashun' and prolong their marriage in hopes of getting better 'matches' or getting more money from her salary.
Not their fault. If their whore dotter can not keep her legs closed, that is on her. They gave her the chance but she didn't keep her legs closed. The socially acceptable behaviour is partially built on trust between parents and child. If the child can not keep that belief, then the randi jeeta is at the blame, I will not, blame her poor mother or even her father for trying to be good parents, they did nothing to deserve this whore.
>I mean, no hate to wahmen who are actually smart and all, but vast majority of women are better off being employed in some blue collar work and married off early.
I also agree, but this can't be infact pushed as a blame on their parents either. Again anon, this is just in hindsight and whataboutism on what has caused this. It doesn't change that jeetas are librands, and the nation's, culture's and entire faith's crash can be pointed out to them.
>And I show no such bias to my own family, just other day I told my parents that even their dotter is better off being married off early and they should stop deluding she will become some Kiran Bedi with her actual academic talent lol.
That is good if you are willing to do that and I will admire that, but again, that doesn't prove me to be wrong in slightest. Left is for women and the right is for men, right wing by default are willing to get their hands dirty and face social distain.
Right wing beliefs such as slaughtering every single homosexual, transvestite, mud slime, or bhangi will be held as illegal and women align with whatever is socially acceptable belief that has been repeated the loudest.
Majority of the working class UC, be it OBC and UR will choose to align with right wing ideology for this very reason, but their is simply not reason for anyone to polarise on these votes, since these groups, specially UR themself are not a majority in this nation.
cmKCTb
No.464688
>>464638
>Kuch nhi ho sakta pajeet ka. Pajeet cuck hon ke liye hi paiyda hua hai
Unironically true, this reminds me of that one delhi chamar who allowed his wife to sleep with other men in hopes of fixing his marriage. That entire thread was subhuman shit, absolutely brutal humiliation ritual.
cmKCTb
No.464690
>>464639
>We are talking about India here
What applies globally also applies in India anon. Left favours women and it is universally true kek.
>There is no point in continuing this conversation if you are being this dishonest.
Yaar Pajeet.
>All you will be doing is continue spamming a wall of seethe at me.
Anon, i am giving you reason, if you are having issues reading them, just let me know, i will go on simplifying it for you, as i do for majority of foids.
cmKCTb
No.464694
>>464654
>I hate both.
Good for you anon, may you go down on a girl and taste the better men on her 
>Sorry i am not gay for men like you are to excuse them. I hate those men. They are as much responsible
They are not kek. Men have value from how many women they sleep with. Women get their value with how less men they sleep with. It is just naturally easy for women to get sex. Whores do exist in all time periods, it's only this one where whores think they count as women and stuff like wife material.
Again, you are free to ask whore makers to not marry as well, no where have I said they are not part of problem, they are simply not as much to blame as the whores.
cmKCTb
No.464696
>>464661
I literally explained it in next line yaar, Pajeet go read.
