/b/ - Random

The Victorian Question

Anonymous

loc-IN

y3vz8tiyzkl.png

Anytime when some conservative pajeet harps on degeneracy, the standard response from a librandu - 'Why do you care? Don't you know the thing you care about is forced on you by Victorian British and Muslim invaders? Hindu culture is very liberal and open to all kinds of degenerate behaviours sirs'. First of all this is wrong, there's enough scriptural evidence that ancient Hindus are even more against degeneracy than many (auto-excised)s and christcucks, a few pictures of degenerate behaviour in a few temples doesn't change it. What's curious is that these same pictures also depict other kinds of degenerate behaviour like bestiality, pedophilia and incest but these librandus doesn't see it as endorsement for such behaviour by ancient Hindus because they're not endorsed and promoted by globohomo(yet). But assuming even if it's true, what's your point? That degenerate heendus got cucked and invaded by a far more conservative and disciplined (auto-excised)/british culture? Is that the hill you want to die on? Let's all be like how New Age negroes thought hindus were - drink, smoke and merry and lived like apes with open sexual norms and closer to nature and sheit, forget civilization building and the future. This is a midwit's conception of history. The worthiness of cultural values should be judged by their ascendancy, not decline. We should be learning what helped British to conquer the world by learning what they valued when they conquered the world, ie the Victorian era. Not their absolute state now. Same for our own Hindu culture. We should judge them by what they did during their golden age, not their behaviour when they were conquered by (auto-excised)s.