Explain dumeel nadu's economic success then faggots. You naarthoids hailing from bimapoo states for some odd reason love the south inspite of getting dickmogged, rerjerbhation mogged and shietttttttttttttttt by dumeel bros.
EXTk8C
No.8380
>>8372(OP)
Why does Stalin go to Singapore for medical treatment if TN is such a success
EXTk8C
No.8381
>>8372(OP)
Also TN financials are in shambles. They are most likely looting temple gold as well.
DyJo3p
No.8383
>>8372(OP)
When 95% of population gets reservations(5% being tambrams used as political scapegoats), it doesnt mean anything, you end up where you started.
slsoGH
No.8709
All of these before 1967:
TN had a literacy rate of 50% when Bimaru had 20%.
TN health care ecosystem has been in place for centuries.
TN had a well laid road network and rolling stocks of public transport exponentially than Bimaru.
TN had more industries in kongu and chennai than all of Bimaru.
Of course we had coastal advantage and FEP.
All of these have nothing to do with dravidian ideology. Periyar supported INC in 1967 against DMK. In fact the faction that Periyar supported has lost 5 out of 6 times. Libertarian Rajaji supported DMK to overthrow INC.
As far as high economic growth, TN has urbanised the most and half of the farmer families shifted from agriculture to services in the past two decades.
Reservation is a joke practically. 97% of the population has reservation. 20% UCs other than brahmins got into BC, MBC.
3% Brahmins anyway emigrate and get better opportunities.
slsoGH
No.8710
>>8383
97% vs 3%.
When technically Non-Brahmin UCs 17-22% can compete in 27% BC (or 20% MBC) + 31% OC : 51-58% quota, Merit is seldom lost; except that your politics functions on hate against the 3%.
UfaKE3
No.8711
UfaKE3
No.8712
>>8709
Bimarus got buttfucked by British for rebelling. TN got rewarded for sucking wrinkled white dick.
UfaKE3
No.8713
4HdFxi
No.8714
>>8713
There is no saying he is not just indian eppstein
>Soythie
>Baniya
>Liked little girls
>Against ethics
>Monopolised power
>Supposed the subhumans
slsoGH
No.8718
>>8712
There is no relation between the two. Madras rebelled way before 1857 (Look up Vellore Mutiny). India's earliest conflicts against the Brits were Tamils - Alagu muthukon, Puli thevar, Kattabomman.
Most of the foundational investments in south took place in late 19th century and early 20th century. Mughal-ravaged bimarus were already backward.
It's simply that Brits did not invest in south because there was no incentive for them.
flKg/o
No.9016
>>8372(OP)
Reminder Dumeel Nadu developed because of Brahmins not because of their stinky subhuman chamaar abo negro monkeys that inhabit that stinky sweaty wasteland shithole
