why majority of the freedom fighters come from 10% of the population
does it mean that british raj was good for bahujans
WVT9R6
No.8815
u6Y5Nj
No.8833
>>8811(OP)
>does it mean that british raj was good for bahujans
<He doesn't know who was sucking British cocks
You should unironically ho and read what boba saheb wrote on who gifted the india to anglos.
ztylNG
No.8836
>>8811(OP)
>does it mean that british raj was good for bahujans
lol british industrialization affected shudras the worst. entire shudra group were out of their traditional occupation - couple it with forced farming for raw materials it was over.
otoh brahmins, khastriyas succeeded in this system because, the british education system was perfect for wordcellers. kshatriyas could join as a sepoy without any issue.
idk why you guys suck up to british this much. this only shows how their propaganda worked that instead of the actual enemy you started seething about UCs.
WVT9R6
No.8837
>>8833
but they call UCs the bootlickers of brits
WVT9R6
No.8838
>>8836
if so why only UCs revolted not shudras or dalits
ztylNG
No.8839
>>8838
Social stature. shudras or dalits were in no position to think beyond sustaining their existence - however there were likely many shudra groups or even dalits who were part of the movement.
There are many martial cast/es who are from shudra background.
ztylNG
No.8840
>>8839
and also economic success.
S57hGu
No.8841
>>8836
>british industrialization affected shudras the worst.
False Equivalence. Shudra are not Avarnia or vice versa. Yadav's might let some subhuman come and rail their daughter nowdays, same for all the other OBC's nowdays but it was not the case back in the day. Rest of it is still correct i believe.
>>8837
You are not supposed to take subhumans in any realm of existence seriously. It's like people didn't learn anything from what Europeans did to the Gypsies.
>>8839
>shudras or dalits were in no position to think beyond sustaining their existence
Mopla revolt
R4Sixr
No.8843
>>8811(OP)
Freedom fighter were anti nationalist terrorist
7hENZv
No.8850
>>8811(OP)
90% singh
WVT9R6
No.8851
>>8839
if UCs were rich why would they rebel
WVT9R6
No.8852
WVT9R6
No.8853
if most of the freedom fighter were UCs why 'they' say that UCs supported brits
aEr4R+
No.8865
aEr4R+
No.8866
>>8811(OP)
Chamars were gwareeb pepo. Only a fraction of the pappulation was part of the elites back in da day with the brits being the overlords.
History has shown us or sum sheit that it is the elites who get into a power tussle to rape over each other and create a new systum to get themselves in the throne, overthrowing the old kangs.
The new UC elites soon realised that they can't rule by neglecting the chamars since the globalist jews will force them to have a democratic systum. So they decided it was best to rape owar the gwareeb UCs and give power to chamars as a form of welfare while keeping their influence rock solid or sum sheiz and now these old elites could behave like jews and go to the west or sum other nashun in the days of globalization and hedge against the endian systum by establishing their kids abroad too.
>ananwa you deviating
shuddup bladeee I haven't mann khuke baatmaxxed in a long taime
VlpWCd
No.8867
>>8866
Pretty sure chamars don't wanna see UCs in power even if the leader is leftist. UC elites first raped the ass of poor UCs and will soon get raped by the subhuman chamars they pampered.
7hENZv
No.8868
>>8852
oh i didnt saw it was state wise and here i though all of them had singh
aEr4R+
No.8870
>>8867
yes that is why they havehedged against the endian systum by sending their kids to be settled in different cuntrees like the jews did in the 19th century or sum sheiz
TPdFmm
No.8949
>>8811(OP)
The greatest resentment is felt by elites when another elite takes over
