/rta/ - Religion and Philosophy

Board for discussions related to Dharma.

Going back to BasicsAs we discussed and shared earlier, I am going bac...
Social Media Crossposts Policy and Threads on /b/ Since anons bring up this issue repeatedly, let's ...
Update on Threads which were deleted between 12 DeAs you guys know that certain threads were randoml...
[View Noticeboard]
0/4000

BharatChan Disclaimer

Notice

Before proceeding, please read and understand the following:

1. BharatChan is a user-generated content platform. The site owners do not claim responsibility for posts made by users.

2. By accessing this website, you acknowledge that content may not be suitable for all audiences.

3. You must follow BharatChan’s community guidelines and rules. Failure to do so may result in a ban.

4. By using BharatChan users agree to the use of cookies, mostly for session related to user.

A poster on BharatChan must abide by the following rules:

Sitewide Rules
You must be 18 or older to post.
Sharing personal details or engaging in doxing is strictly prohibited.
Political discussions should be confined to /pol/.
Off-topic discussions, thread derailment, or spam may result in a ban and IP blacklist.
Pornographic content is strictly prohibited.
Any activity violating local laws is not allowed.
If you are not an Indian, you can only post in /int/. Or create and account and ask for approval to post in other boards.
Acknowledge

Effeminization of Krishna

Anonymous

IN

F9tDYI

No.722

Bhagavad Gita 4.7–8

>Whenever there is a decline in righteousness and a rise in unrighteousness, O Arjuna, at that time I manifest Myself. To protect the good, to destroy the wicked, and to establish dharma, I appear in age after age

Bhagavad Gita 7.7

>There is nothing higher than Me, O Arjuna. All that exists is strung on Me like pearls on a thread

Bhagavad Gita 11.32

> I am Time, the great destroyer of the worlds, and I have come to annihilate all beings

These verses make it clear that Krishna is the Supreme God — Svayam Bhagavan, not merely a charming cowherd but the very source of creation, sustenance, and destruction.

Yet over the centuries, especially in medieval and modern devotional traditions, Krishna’s playful and romantic aspects (madhurya) have often overshadowed his majestic and warrior aspects (aiswarya). ISKCON, for example, emphasizes Krishna’s sweetness, love, and flute-playing, while giving less attention to his role as a ruthless strategist and destroyer of adharma.

But the Krishna of the Mahabharata is both. He severed Shishupala’s head with his Sudarshana Chakra, guided the Pandavas in avenging the Kauravas, and was strategically involved in the downfall of Bhishma, Drona, and Karna.

Krishna, therefore, is not just a symbol of divine love, he is also the cosmic power who destroys evil. He embodies both the tenderness of devotion and the fierceness of justice.

Anonymous

IN

gY9yDR

No.724

>>722(OP)

Krishna even as a character feels like 3 different people sewed into one for the sake of continuity

Krishan till he killed kans is totally different than the kirshna who was in Mahabharata and even the krishna after Mahabharata who became the king of dwarika was very different from both of these

You can never remove the Effeminization from krishna because he is not a consistent character even in his own stories

Instead of focusing on masculinisation of Krishna, it would be better if everyone adopted Ram over him as he is actually a continuous character and is not too Machiavellian for the general populace

Anonymous

IN

b3Ocox

No.727

>>722(OP)

>>724

bansuriwala makhanchor

Active Users in /rta/: N/A