We don’t have a great filmmaker (no debates here, by great I mean internationally acclaimed and someone culturally significant) or a great writer (no, Arundhati Soy isn’t one).
Why is that so?
>because muhh pajeet are dumb
I don’t think so. Take a loot at ancient Indian literature, Kalidasa’s Shakuntala caused a whole shockwave in Europe when it was translated into English. Goethe (regarded as Europe’s finest intellectual OAT) even wrote a literal poem just to praise it.
And if you come to modern times; Ray and Tagore were brilliant men. I know they were Bengali and ray was a bit cucky, still they did represent a new-born independent India.
Their works are KINO.
>no audience
I don’t think so. In a billion people nation, there have to be some people who are into these stuff. There are enough cinephile and lit-heads.
I really can’t come up with a good reason, why is this the case. Help me out, fellow bhach chads.
Why does Modern-India lack artistic figures!?
Anonymous
loc-IN
l9omc31to4.mp4
We don’t have a great *filmmaker* (no debates here, by great I mean internationally acclaimed and someone culturally significant) or a great *writer* (no, Arundhati Soy isn’t one).
Why is that so?
>because muhh pajeet are dumb
I don’t think so. Take a loot at ancient Indian literature, Kalidasa’s Shakuntala caused a whole shockwave in Europe when it was translated into English. Goethe (regarded as Europe’s finest intellectual OAT) even wrote a literal poem just to praise it.
And if you come to modern times; Ray and Tagore were brilliant men. I know they were Bengali and ray was a bit cucky, still they did represent a new-born independent India.
Their works are KINO.
>no audience
I don’t think so. In a billion people nation, there have to be some people who are into these stuff. There are enough cinephile and lit-heads.
I really can’t come up with a good reason, why is this the case. Help me out, fellow bhach chads.