/sa/ - Sāhitya & Itihāsa

Board for discussions related to Literature and History.

Going back to BasicsAs we discussed and shared earlier, I am going bac...
Social Media Crossposts Policy and Threads on /b/ Since anons bring up this issue repeatedly, let's ...
Update on Threads which were deleted between 12 DeAs you guys know that certain threads were randoml...
[View Noticeboard]
0/4000

BharatChan Disclaimer

Notice

Before proceeding, please read and understand the following:

1. BharatChan is a user-generated content platform. The site owners do not claim responsibility for posts made by users.

2. By accessing this website, you acknowledge that content may not be suitable for all audiences.

3. You must follow BharatChan’s community guidelines and rules. Failure to do so may result in a ban.

4. By using BharatChan users agree to the use of cookies, mostly for session related to user.

A poster on BharatChan must abide by the following rules:

Sitewide Rules
You must be 18 or older to post.
Sharing personal details or engaging in doxing is strictly prohibited.
Political discussions should be confined to /pol/.
Off-topic discussions, thread derailment, or spam may result in a ban and IP blacklist.
Pornographic content is strictly prohibited.
Any activity violating local laws is not allowed.
If you are not an Indian, you can only post in /int/. Or create and account and ask for approval to post in other boards.
Acknowledge

Racial Map of India

Anonymous

IN

Uzl9bn

No.1161

According to P.S. Guha on his classification of Indian people.

Anonymous

IN

Uzl9bn

No.1162

>>1161(OP)

Anonymous

IN

Uzl9bn

No.1163

>>1162

https://ia801901.us.archive.org/6/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.107765/2015.107765.Disposal-Of-The-Dead-And-Physical-Types-In-Ancient-India.pdf

Anonymous

IN

dcGJnS

No.1167

>>1161(OP)

outdated

(Text Content Sanitized Too.)

Anonymous

ARYA

zsBMWu

No.1203

>>1161(OP)

Interesting find, sirs.

^

CH

6RrlYl

No.1207

>>1161(OP)

This classification isn't very good it misses the most important distinction between North-indide (which goes under Mediterranean), gracile Indide (also under Mediterranean in Guha) and indo-brachid (western brachykephals in Guhas classification).

Also Guha misses Weddids (which he compiles under Australoids, which is wrong)

Eickstedt created a much better and accurate classification system.

these two diagrammes are compiled from his books

Anonymous

RJ

VHiQi9

No.1218

>>1161(OP)

Shocking how accurate he is based on his times.

Anonymous

RJ

VHiQi9

No.1223

>>1207

>between North-indide (which goes under Mediterranean), gracile Indide (also under Mediterranean in Guha) and indo-brachid (western brachykephals in Guhas classification).

That is phenotype. Phenotype is not genetics.

^

CH

6RrlYl

No.1224

>>1223

Phenotype is an expression of your genetics lol

And Guhas classification is just bad.

Anonymous

RJ

VHiQi9

No.1225

>>1224

>Phenotype =\ genotype.

She is a chitpavan Brahmin whose genetics is very similar to Tamil Brahmins.

Anonymous

IN

YAha8K

No.1226

retarded, nordic and meds have no relation with indians.

Active Users in /sa/: N/A