According to P.S. Guha on his classification of Indian people.
Racial Map of India

Uzl9bn
No.1161

Uzl9bn
No.1162
>>1161(OP)
dcGJnS
No.1167

zsBMWu
No.1203
>>1161(OP)
Interesting find, sirs.

6RrlYl
No.1207
>>1161(OP)
This classification isn't very good it misses the most important distinction between North-indide (which goes under Mediterranean), gracile Indide (also under Mediterranean in Guha) and indo-brachid (western brachykephals in Guhas classification).
Also Guha misses Weddids (which he compiles under Australoids, which is wrong)
Eickstedt created a much better and accurate classification system.
these two diagrammes are compiled from his books

VHiQi9
No.1218
>>1161(OP)
Shocking how accurate he is based on his times.

VHiQi9
No.1223
>>1207
>between North-indide (which goes under Mediterranean), gracile Indide (also under Mediterranean in Guha) and indo-brachid (western brachykephals in Guhas classification).
That is phenotype. Phenotype is not genetics.

6RrlYl
No.1224

VHiQi9
No.1225
>>1224
>Phenotype =\ genotype.
She is a chitpavan Brahmin whose genetics is very similar to Tamil Brahmins.
YAha8K
No.1226
retarded, nordic and meds have no relation with indians.











